Vores kunder ligger øverst på Google

Google Ads Specialister fra Vestjylland

Vi er 100% dedikerede til Google Annoncering – Vi har mange års erfaring med Google Ads og den bruger vi på at opsætte, optimere & vedligeholde vores fantastiske kunders konti.

100% Specialiseret i Google Ads
Vi har mange års erfaring fra +300 konti
Ingen lange bindinger & evighedskontrakter
Jævnlig opfølgning med hver enkelt kunde
Vi tager din virksomhed seriøst

1.117 resultater (0,31726 sekunder)

Mærke

Butik

Pris (EUR)

Nulstil filter

Produkter
Fra
Butikker

Challenges in Machine Generation of Analytic Products from Multi-Source Data - Intelligence Community Studies Board - Bog - National Academies Press -

Challenges in Machine Generation of Analytic Products from Multi-Source Data - Intelligence Community Studies Board - Bog - National Academies Press -

The Intelligence Community Studies Board of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine convened a workshop on August 9-10, 2017 to examine challenges in machine generation of analytic products from multi-source data. Workshop speakers and participants discussed research challenges related to machine-based methods for generating analytic products and for automating the evaluation of these products, with special attention to learning from small data, using multi-source data, adversarial learning, and understanding the human-machine relationship. This publication summarizes the presentations and discussions from the workshop. Table of ContentsFront Matter1 Introduction2 Session 1: Plenary3 Session 2: Machine Learning from Image, Video, and Map Data4 Session 3: Machine Learning from Natural Languages5 Session 4: Learning from Multi-Source Data6 Session 5: Learning from Noisy, Adversarial Inputs7 Session 6: Learning from Social Media8 Session 7: Humans and Machines Working Together with Big Data9 Session 8: Use of Machine Learning for Privacy Ethics10 Session 9: Evaluation of Machine-Generated Products11 Session 10: Capability Technology MatrixAppendixesAppendix A: Biographical Sketches of Workshop Planning CommitteeAppendix B: Workshop AgendaAppendix C: Workshop Statement of TaskAppendix D: Capability Technology TablesAppendix E: Acronyms

DKK 344.00
1

2009-2010 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory - Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board - Bog - National Academies Press -

2009-2010 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory - Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board - Bog - National Academies Press -

The charge of the Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board (ARLTAB) is to provide biannual assessments of the scientific and technical quality of the research, development, and analysis programs at the Army Research Laboratory (ARL). The advice provided in this report focuses on technical rather than programmatic considerations. The Board is assisted by six National Research Council (NRC) panels, each of which focuses on the portion of the ARL program conducted by one of ARL's six directorates. When requested to do so by ARL, the Board also examines work that cuts across the directorates. The Board has been performing assessments of ARL since 1996. The current report summarizes its finding for the 2009-2010 period, during which 96 volunteer experts in fields of science and engineering participated in the following activities: visiting ARL annually, receiving formal presentations of technical work, examining facilities, engaging in technical discussions with ARL staff, and reviewing ARL technical materials. The Board continues to be impressed by the overall quality of ARL's technical staff and their work and applauds ARL for its clear, passionate concern for the end user of its technology—the soldier in the field—and for ARL's demonstrated mindfulness of the importance of transitioning technology to support immediate and longer-term Army needs. ARL staff also continue to expand their involvement with the wider scientific and engineering community. In general, ARL is working very well within an appropriate research and development (R&D) niche and has been demonstrating significant accomplishments. Table of ContentsFront MatterSummary1 Introduction2 Computational and Information Sciences Directorate3 Human Research and Engineering Directorate4 Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate5 Survivability and Lethality Analysis Directorate6 Vehicle Technology Directorate7 Weapons and Materials Research Directorate8 Crosscutting OverviewAppendixesAppendix A: Army Research Laboratory Organization Chart and Staffing ProfileAppendix B: Membership of the Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board and Its PanelsAppendix C: Assessment CriteriaAppendix D: Acronyms

DKK 240.00
1

Enhancing Urban Sustainability with Data, Modeling, and Simulation - Board On Energy And Environmental Systems - Bog - National Academies Press -

Enhancing Urban Sustainability with Data, Modeling, and Simulation - Board On Energy And Environmental Systems - Bog - National Academies Press -

On January 30-31, 2019 the Board on Mathematical Sciences and Analytics, in collaboration with the Board on Energy and Environmental Systems and the Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, convened a workshop in Washington, D.C. to explore the frontiers of mathematics and data science needs for sustainable urban communities. The workshop strengthened the emerging interdisciplinary network of practitioners, business leaders, government officials, nonprofit stakeholders, academics, and policy makers using data, modeling, and simulation for urban and community sustainability, and addressed common challenges that the community faces. Presentations highlighted urban sustainability research efforts and programs under way, including research into air quality, water management, waste disposal, and social equity and discussed promising urban sustainability research questions that improved use of big data, modeling, and simulation can help address. This publication summarizes the presentation and discussion of the workshop. Table of ContentsFront Matter1 Introduction2 Framing the Problem3 Advances in Data, Modeling, and Simulation4 Challenges and Opportunities for Cities5 Identifying Directions for Partnership6 Reflections and Next StepsReferencesAppendixesAppendix A: Workshop AgendaAppendix B: Registered Workshop ParticipantsAppendix C: Workshop Planning Committee Biographical Information

DKK 370.00
1

2015-2016 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory - Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board - Bog - National Academies Press -

2015-2016 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory - Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board - Bog - National Academies Press -

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board (ARLTAB) provides biennial assessments of the scientific and technical quality of the research, development, and analysis programs at the Army Research Laboratory (ARL), focusing on ballistics sciences, human sciences, information sciences, materials sciences, and mechanical sciences. This interim report summarizes the findings of the Board for the first year of this biennial assessment; the current report addresses approximately half the portfolio for each campaign; the remainder will be assessed in 2016. During the first year the Board examined the following elements within the ARL's science and technology campaigns: biological and bioinspired materials, energy and power materials, and engineered photonics materials; battlefield injury mechanisms, directed energy, and armor and adaptive protection; sensing and effecting, and system intelligence and intelligent systems; advanced computing architectures, computing sciences, data-intensive sciences, and predictive simulation sciences; human-machine interaction, intelligence and control, and perception; humans in multiagent systems, real-world behavior, and toward human variability; and mission capability of systems. A second, final report will subsume the findings of this interim report and add the findings from the second year of the review. Table of ContentsFront MatterSummary1 Introduction2 Materials Research3 Sciences for Lethality and Protection4 Information Sciences5 Computational Sciences6 Sciences for Maneuver7 Human Sciences8 Crosscutting Conclusions and Recommendations and Exceptional AccomplishmentsAppendix A: Army Research Laboratory Organization and Science and Technology Campaign FrameworkAppendix B: Biographical Sketches of Army Research LaboratoryTechnical Assessment Board Members and StaffAppendix C: Assessment CriteriaAppendix D: Acronyms

DKK 370.00
1

Next Steps for TIMSS - Board On International Comparative Studies In Education - Bog - National Academies Press - Plusbog.dk

Next Steps for TIMSS - Board On International Comparative Studies In Education - Bog - National Academies Press - Plusbog.dk

Now that the initial results of The Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) have been released, the Board on International Comparative Studies in Education (BICSE) has turned its attention to what happens next. The TIMSS data are potentially useful to researchers, policy makers, practitioners, and others interested in evidence regarding factors that influence student learning. But although the study has produced a remarkable volume of intriguing data, it is by no means complete. Scholarly review of the initial data, evaluations of claims based on the data, and follow-up secondary analysis based on the primary findings are all integral parts of a study of this magnitude, but the bulk of this very important work has not yet begun. Because of the board's serious concern that this necessary work has not been undertaken, or funded, it held a workshop on June 17 and 18, 1998, to explore different perspectives on possible next steps. The workshop was an invaluable opportunity for the board to explore issues and questions it has addressed over the years and to solidify its thinking about many of them. Because the board is convinced of the importance of moving forward with the TIMSS data, it presents in this report both recommendations as to what ought to be done and many of the innovative specific ideas that emerged from the workshop. These recommendations reflect the board's conviction, based on its many years of involvement with and deliberations about TIMSS, that this study is an extremely rich resource for the policy, scholarly, and practice communities, and that all of these groups have a responsibility to take full advantage of it. The recommendations and discussion in this report are intended to assist both researchers and funders who are considering further work with TIMSS, and a broader audience of researchers, policy makers, practitioners, and others who have followed the TIMSS results and are eager to use them. This report is, in a sense, the culmination of many years of effort for the board.

DKK 305.00
1

2013-2014 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory - Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board - Bog - National Academies Press -

2015-2016 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory - Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board - Bog - National Academies Press -

2017-2018 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory - Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board - Bog - National Academies Press -