Vores kunder ligger øverst på Google

Google Ads Specialister fra Vestjylland

Vi er 100% dedikerede til Google Annoncering – Vi har mange års erfaring med Google Ads og den bruger vi på at opsætte, optimere & vedligeholde vores fantastiske kunders konti.

100% Specialiseret i Google Ads
Vi har mange års erfaring fra +300 konti
Ingen lange bindinger & evighedskontrakter
Jævnlig opfølgning med hver enkelt kunde
Vi tager din virksomhed seriøst

12 resultater (0,22519 sekunder)

Mærke

Butik

Pris (EUR)

Nulstil filter

Produkter
Fra
Butikker

Memoirs of Victor Hugo - Victor Hugo - Bog - Nova Science Publishers Inc - Plusbog.dk

Unemployment Insurance - - Bog - Nova Science Publishers Inc - Plusbog.dk

Tsunami Forecasting & Preparedness - - Bog - Nova Science Publishers Inc - Plusbog.dk

Judge Sonia Sotomayor - - Bog - Nova Science Publishers Inc - Plusbog.dk

United States Army Drawdown & Restructuring - - Bog - Nova Science Publishers Inc - Plusbog.dk

Campaign Finance Legislation in Congress - Joseph E Cantor - Bog - Nova Science Publishers Inc - Plusbog.dk

Behavioral & Mental Health Coverage - - Bog - Nova Science Publishers Inc - Plusbog.dk

Genetic Information - - Bog - Nova Science Publishers Inc - Plusbog.dk

Awards of Attorneys' Fees by Federal Courts & Federal Agencies - Henry Cohen - Bog - Nova Science Publishers Inc - Plusbog.dk

Awards of Attorneys' Fees by Federal Courts & Federal Agencies - Henry Cohen - Bog - Nova Science Publishers Inc - Plusbog.dk

In the United States, the general rule, which derives from common law, is that each side in a legal proceeding pays for its own attorney. There are many exceptions, however, in which federal courts, and occasionally federal agencies, may order the losing party to pay the attorneys'' fees of the prevailing party. The major common law exception authorises federal courts (not agencies) to order a losing party that acts in bad faith to pay the prevailing party''s fees. There are also roughly two hundred statutory exceptions, which were generally enacted to encourage private litigation to implement public policy. Awards of attorneys'' fees are often designed to help to equalise contests between private individual plaintiffs and corporate or governmental defendants. Thus, attorneys'' fees provisions are most often found in civil rights, environmental protection, and consumer protection statutes. In addition, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) makes the United States liable for attorneys'' fees of up to $125 per hour in many court cases and administrative proceedings that it loses (and some that it wins) and fails to prove that its position was substantially justified. EAJA does not apply in tax cases, but a similar statute, 26 U.S.C. § 7430, does. Most Supreme Court decisions involving attorneys'' fees have interpreted civil rights statutes, and this book focuses on these statutes. It also discusses awards of costs other than attorneys'' fees in federal courts, how courts compute the amount of attorneys'' fees to be awarded, statutory limitations on attorneys'' fees, and other subjects. In addition, it sets forth the language of all federal attorneys'' fees provisions, and includes a bibliography of congressional committee reports and hearings concerning attorneys'' fees. In 1997, Congress enacted a statute allowing awards of attorneys'' fees to some prevailing criminal defendants.

DKK 514.00
1

Homeland Security Department Appropriations - - Bog - Nova Science Publishers Inc - Plusbog.dk

Homeland Security Department Appropriations - - Bog - Nova Science Publishers Inc - Plusbog.dk

This book describes the FY2008 appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The Administration requested a net appropriation of $35.5 billion in net budget authority for FY2008. The requested net appropriation for major components of the department included the following: $8,783 million for Customs and Border Protection (CBP); $4,168 million for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE); $3,608 million for the Transportation Security Administration (TSA); $8,457 million for the U.S. Coast Guard; $1,399 million for the Secret Service; $1,047 for the National Protection and Programs Directorate (NPP); $5,042 million for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA); $30 million for US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS); $799 million for the Science and Technology Directorate (S&T); and $562 million for the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO). The House passed H.R. 2638 on June 15, 2007. H.R. 2638 would provide $37.4 billion in net budget authority for DHS for FY2008. H.R. 2638 contains the following in net budget authority for major components of DHS: $8,923 million for CBP; $4,192 million for ICE; $3,842 million for the TSA; $8,352 million for the U.S. Coast Guard; $1,396 million for the Secret Service; $1,035 for the NPP; $7,239 million for FEMA; $30 million for USCIS; $777 million for S&T; and $556 million for the DNDO. The Senate Appropriations Committee reported its bill, S. 1644, on June 14, 2007. The Senate took up the House bill on July 19, 2007, and substituted its text with that in S. 1644. On July 26, 2007, the Senate passed its version of H.R. 2638. The Senate bill would provide $40.6 billion in net budget authority, including $3 billion in emergency funding; not including the emergency funding, Senate-passed H.R. 2638 would provide $37.6 billion in net budget authority for DHS for FY2008. The bill contains the following amounts of net budget authority for major components of DHS: $8,841 million for CBP; $4,433 million for ICE; $3,685 million for the TSA; $8,559 million for the U.S. Coast Guard; $1,396 million for the Secret Service; $914 for the NPP; $7,019 million for FEMA; $50 million (plus and additional $60 million in emergency funding) for USCIS; $838 million for the S&T; and $550 million for the DNDO. Senate-passed H.R. 2638 also included a $3,000 million emergency supplemental appropriation for border-security purposes.

DKK 514.00
1

Border Security - Blas Nunez Neto - Bog - Nova Science Publishers Inc - Plusbog.dk

Border Security - Blas Nunez Neto - Bog - Nova Science Publishers Inc - Plusbog.dk

Congress has repeatedly shown interest in examining and expanding the barriers being deployed along the U.S. international land border. The 109th Congress passed a number of laws affecting these barriers, and oversight of these laws and of the construction process may be of interest to the 110th Congress. The United States Border Patrol (USBP) deploys fencing, which aims to impede the illegal entry of individuals, and vehicle barriers, which aim to impede the illegal entry of vehicles (but not individuals) along the border. The USBP first began erecting barriers in 1990 to deter illegal entries and drug smuggling in its San Diego sector. The ensuing 14 mile-long San Diego "primary fence" formed part of the USBP''s "Prevention Through Deterrence" strategy, which called for reducing unauthorised migration by placing agents and resources directly on the border along population centres in order to deter would-be migrants from entering the country. In 1996, Congress passed the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act which, among other things, explicitly gave the Attorney General (now the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security) broad authority to construct barriers along the border and authorised the construction of a secondary layer of fencing to buttress the completed 14 mile primary fence. Construction of the secondary fence stalled due to environmental concerns raised by the California Coastal Commission. In 2005, Congress passed the REAL ID Act that authorised the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to waive all legal requirements in order to expedite the construction of border barriers. DHS has announced it will use this waiver authority to complete the San Diego fence. The Secure Fence Act of 2006 directed DHS to construct 850 miles of additional border fencing. This requirement was subsequently modified by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (P.L. 110-161), which was enacted into law on December 26, 2007. The act requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to construct fencing along not less than 700 miles of the south-west border. While the San Diego fence, combined with an increase in agents and other resources in the USBP''s San Diego sector, has proven effective in reducing the number of apprehensions made in that sector, there is considerable evidence that the flow of illegal immigration has adapted to this enforcement posture and has shifted to the more remote areas of the Arizona desert. Nationally, the USBP made 1.2 million apprehensions in 1992 and again in 2004, suggesting that the increased enforcement in San Diego sector has had little impact on overall apprehensions. In addition to border fencing, the USBP deploys both permanent and temporary vehicle barriers to the border. Temporary vehicle barriers are typically chained together and can be moved to different locations at the USBP''s discretion. Permanent vehicle barriers are embedded in the ground and are meant to remain in one location. A number of policy issues concerning border barriers generally and fencing specifically may be of interest to Congress, including, but not limited, to their effectiveness, costs versus benefits, location, design, environmental impact, potential diplomatic ramifications, and the costs of acquiring the land needed for construction.

DKK 608.00
1

Terrorism - Kenneth Katzman - Bog - Nova Science Publishers Inc - Plusbog.dk

Terrorism - Kenneth Katzman - Bog - Nova Science Publishers Inc - Plusbog.dk

This book is an analysis of Near Eastern terrorist groups and countries on the. U.S. "terrorism list," a list of countries that the Secretary of Commerce and Secretary of State have determined provide repeated support for international terrorism. This book adopts the same definition of terrorism as that used by the State Department in its annual reports the definition contained in Title 22 U.S.C. Section 2656f(d). According to this section, "terrorism" means "premeditated politically motivated violence perpetrated against non combatant targets by sub national groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience." Five out of the seven states currently on the terrorism list are located in the Near East region Iran, Iraq Syria, Libya, and Sudan. (The other two are Cuba and North Korea, which will not be covered in this book). The composition of the list has not changed since Sudan was added in 1993. The groups analysed in this book include, but are not limited to, those designated as "Foreign Terrorist Organisations" (FTOs), pursuant to the Anti Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (P.L. 104 132). The last section of the book discusses significant themes in U.S. unilateral and multilateral efforts to combat terrorism in or from the region. The State Department''s annual report on international terrorism, entitled Patterns of Global Terrorism: 2000; is a significant source for this book; other sources include press reports and conversations with U.S. counter terrorism officials, experts, investigative journalists, and foreign diplomats. Although the September 11 attacks have placed Near Eastern terrorist groups at the centre of U.S. anti terrorism policy, Near Eastern terrorist groups and their state sponsors have been a focus of U.S. counter-terrorism policies for several decades. Since the 1970s, many of the most high profile acts of terrorism against American citizens and targets have been conducted by these groups, sometimes with the encouragement or at the instigation of their state sponsors. However, no single terrorist attack either in or outside the Near East region compares in scale to the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, which killed a total of over 3,000 persons. Senior U.S. officials have attributed this attack to the Al Qaeda network, whose leaders enjoyed sanctuary in Afghanistan from 1996 until their defeat at the hands of the U.S. military and its Afghan partners in late 2001. According to Patterns of Global Terrorism: 2000 (available on the U.S. Department of State''s web site at http://www.state.gov/s/et/rls/pgtipt/2000/]; hereafter cited as Patterns 2000), world-wide terrorism related casualties increased to 405 in 2000 from 233 in 1999, but the number of attacks increased only slightly, from 392 in 1999 to 423 in 2000. Of these 2000 totals, only 16 of the 423 attacks and 19 of the 405 casualties occurred in the Middle East, although Patterns 2000 covered only three months of the Palestinian uprising that began in late September 2000. Since 2001 began, there have been dozens of terrorism related Israeli casualties resulting from Palestinian suicide bomb attacks, some of them in retaliation for Israeli actions against suspected Palestinian militants. Thirty one of the attacks and 12 of the deaths during 2000 occurred in Eurasia (Central Asia, the Caucasus, and. Russia). The terrorist groups analyzed often differ in their motivations, objectives, ideologies, and levels of activity. The Islamist groups remain generally the most active, stating as their main objective the overthrow of secular, pro Western governments, the derailment of the Arab Israeli peace process, the expulsion of U.S. forces from the region, or the end of what they consider unjust occupation of Muslim lands. Some groups, such as the Kurdistan Workers'' Party (PKK), fight for cultural and political rights or the formation of separate ethnically based states. Table 1 below shows the 20 Near Eastern groups currently designated by the State Department as FTOs. The designations were mostly made when the FTO list was inaugurated in October 1997 and revised in October 1999 and October 2001, A group can be added to the list at any time; Al Qaeda (the bin Laden network) was added on August 2 1, 1998, the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan was designated on September 25, 2000, and two Pakistani groups Lashkar e Tayyiba and Jaish-e-Mohammad were added to the FTO list on December 26, 2001.

DKK 534.00
1